Save Our Sausalito Filing: Presence of Special Species Bird Habitat Mandates Protective Action

Sensitive species birds photographed in the Princess Grove on April 3, 2024.

On Monday, Save Our Sausalito raised significant concerns about the biological impact of the proposed luxury condominium development at 605-613 Bridgeway. A detailed report by wildlife biologist Dr. Shawn Smallwood identifies at least ten protected species inhabiting the project site. Save Our Sausalito argues that this environmental impact renders the project ineligible for the streamlined approval process under SB 35.

"Thorough Environmental Review Needed"

In the report, Dr. Smallwood writes, “The presence of these protected species necessitates a more thorough environmental review. The current plans fail to account for the significant biological diversity on the site.”
The report details the presence of species such as Allen’s Hummingbird, Western Gull, Common Loon, Double-crested Cormorant, and California Brown Pelican, among others. Dr. Smallwood’s findings emphasize that any development in this area must carefully consider the habitats and survival of these species.

A golden-crowned sparrow on a California buckeye on the 605-613 Bridgeway site.

Key Concerns:

  • Environmental Incompatibility: The project’s environmental footprint is incompatible with the historic downtown Sausalito area, potentially disrupting local ecosystems.
  • Denial of Ministerial Approval: City officials should deny the project’s ministerial approval due to its significant adverse effects on the environment and community.
  • Requirement for Full EIR: A full environmental impact report (EIR) is necessary to thoroughly assess the potential harm to special species bird habitats and ensure adequate protective measures.
Save Our Sausalito contends that the project’s scale and environmental footprint are incompatible with the historic downtown Sausalito area. The filing urges city officials to deny the project’s ministerial approval based on these findings because full environmental impact report (EIR) is necessary.

"Protecting Our Natural Environment"

“This is not only about the important work of preserving and protecting our historic district; it’s about protecting our natural environment,” a spokesperson for Save Our Sausalito stated. “We cannot allow development that jeopardizes the biodiversity that makes Sausalito unique.”

Local Opposition Grows

The proposed development has faced mounting opposition from local residents and environmental groups. Save Our Sausalito has been at the forefront of these efforts, advocating for sustainable development practices that align with the city’s environmental and historical preservation goals.

City officials are expected to review the findings and make a decision on whether the project can proceed under the current streamlined approval process in spite of the environmental hazards that Dr. Smallwood detailed.

Your contributions make filings like this possible.

Related Articles

The City has released a draft Request for Proposals for the MLK Park and Corporation Yard sites, and we’ve read its 38 pages carefully. The core protections of our charter and Measure K are there but it still needs..
Save Our Sausalito's attorneys have sent a formal letter to the City of Sausalito outlining significant legal, environmental, and factual flaws in the proposed multi-story luxury development at 83 Princess Street—known as "Monster #2."..
Our attorneys filed legal arguments exposing why the 605 Bridgeway and the 83 Princess Street developments cannot proceed. New biology report from Dr. Shawn Smallwood documents Princess Grove, where the developer proposes to clear-cut 33 mature trees leading to..