Save Our Sausalito Filing: Sausalito Must Deny Bridgeway Proposal due to Non-Compliance

Sausalito - Home

On Friday, Save Our Sausalito issued a statement declaring that the proposed developments at 605-613 Bridgeway are inconsistent with Sausalito’s zoning ordinance and general plan. The filing points out that the proposed heights of 85 and 109 feet exceed the 32-foot limit specified in Ordinance 1022, thereby disqualifying the project from streamlined approval under SB 35 and the Density Bonus Law.

"Does Not Comply with Legal Standards"

“The proposed project does not comply with our city’s legal standards,” said a spokesperson for Save Our Sausalito. “Both the zoning ordinance and the general plan are clear about the height restrictions and density limits for this area.”

The Save Our Sausalito filing asserted several main points of contention, including:

  • Density Specifications: The project does not meet density specifications outlined in Sausalito’s general plan.
  • Land Use Designation: The general plan designates the area for “Central Commercial” use, emphasizing retail on the first floor with office or residential uses above.
  • Scale and Mass: The proposed development would overwhelm the district with its scale and mass.
The current Bridgeway proposal would clear-cut what has become known as the Princess Grove, a grove of eleven trees, including magnificent coast live oaks standing 45-feet tall and likely almost a century old.

"Historic Character at Risk"

“The historic character of our downtown area is at risk,” the spokesperson added. “These projects would drastically alter the skyline and streetscape of Sausalito, which is known for its unique, low-rise architecture.”

Legal Interpretation of Housing Accountability Act

Save Our Sausalito’s legal argument hinges on the interpretation of the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) and related laws. The organization asserts that the city’s authority to require a certificate of appropriateness and enforce zoning standards is not limited by the HAA, as the project fails to meet the necessary conditions for streamlined approval.

Public Reactions and Alternatives

Outcry against the project has been substantial. A petition urging the council to deny the proposal has garnered upwards of 1,000 signatures.

 

City officials will consider legal challenges like Save Our Sausalito’s as they review the applications. The decision will have significant implications for the future of development in Sausalito’s historic districts.

Your contributions make filings like this possible.

Related Articles

Save Our Sausalito attorneys submitted a letter urging the City to deny the 605-613 Bridgeway application, outlining legally required reasons for denial. The letter highlighted violations of height limits, zoning regulations, environmental risks, and historical misrepresentation...
Save Our Sausalito submitted detailed comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Programs. The comments call for a thorough reassessment of the DEIR to ensure the protection of Sausalito's historic and biological resources...
New expert report reveals proposed luxury development fails to meet critical preservation standards, raising concerns that it could permanently damage the district’s historical character and jeopardize Sausalito’s status as a Certified Historic District...