Resources
Document Library
Filings, studies, reports, and legal letters behind our campaigns. Search by title, type, source, or campaign.
Type
Campaign
Showing 32 of 32
- Notes for Council Meeting Talk Points for 1 Harbor Drive1 Harbor DriveViewDownload
- 1 Harbor Drive Petition Flyer1 Harbor DriveViewDownload
- Community Forum Presentation (presented April 24, 2026; updated July 13, 2026)1 Harbor DriveViewDownload
- 1 Harbor Drive Project Plans Submitted to City on June 1, 20261 Harbor DriveView →
- SOS Lawyer Letter — CEQA is Required1 Harbor DriveViewDownload
- SOS Letter to the City — Legal & Environmental Deficiencies83 Princess StreetViewDownload
- Updated Wildlife Report — Princess Grove Habitat605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- Wildlife Report — Special-Status Species in the Princess Grove83 Princess StreetViewDownload
- City Notice of Incomplete Application83 Princess StreetViewDownload
- Preliminary Geotechnical Report — the Bulkley Hillside83 Princess StreetViewDownload
- SOS Brief to the City Council — Consistency & CEQA605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- Planning Commission Resolution 2025-07 — Appeal Denied (4–1)605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- Planning Commission Staff Report605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- Disapproval by Course of Conduct605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- SOS Appeal Brief — Consistency & CEQA605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- Historic Resources Technical Report (City's consultant)605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- SOS Response to the Developer's Appeal605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- The Developer's Appeal Was Filed Late605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- City Inconsistency Letter (18 pages)605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- Why the City Should Deny the Application605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- Detailed DEIR Comments — Amended Housing Element605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- Notice of Complete Application605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- Historic Peer Review — The Project Threatens the District605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- EIR Scoping Comments — Protect the Historic District605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- The Density Bonus Does Not Apply605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- Historic Resources Evaluation — 605–613 Bridgeway605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- A Certificate of Appropriateness Is Required605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- Why the Project Is Inconsistent with City Standards605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- SOS Comments on the Draft EIR605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- Biological Impact Report — Special-Status Species on Site605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- Petition Against the 605–613 Bridgeway Development605–613 BridgewayViewDownload
- Historic Design Analysis (City's consultant)605–613 BridgewayViewDownload