Save Our Sausalito Filing: Presence of Special Species Bird Habitat Mandates Protective Action

Sensitive species birds photographed in the Princess Grove on April 3, 2024.

On Monday, Save Our Sausalito raised significant concerns about the biological impact of the proposed luxury condominium development at 605-613 Bridgeway. A detailed report by wildlife biologist Dr. Shawn Smallwood identifies at least ten protected species inhabiting the project site. Save Our Sausalito argues that this environmental impact renders the project ineligible for the streamlined approval process under SB 35.

"Thorough Environmental Review Needed"

In the report, Dr. Smallwood writes, “The presence of these protected species necessitates a more thorough environmental review. The current plans fail to account for the significant biological diversity on the site.”
The report details the presence of species such as Allen’s Hummingbird, Western Gull, Common Loon, Double-crested Cormorant, and California Brown Pelican, among others. Dr. Smallwood’s findings emphasize that any development in this area must carefully consider the habitats and survival of these species.

A golden-crowned sparrow on a California buckeye on the 605-613 Bridgeway site.

Key Concerns:

  • Environmental Incompatibility: The project’s environmental footprint is incompatible with the historic downtown Sausalito area, potentially disrupting local ecosystems.
  • Denial of Ministerial Approval: City officials should deny the project’s ministerial approval due to its significant adverse effects on the environment and community.
  • Requirement for Full EIR: A full environmental impact report (EIR) is necessary to thoroughly assess the potential harm to special species bird habitats and ensure adequate protective measures.
Save Our Sausalito contends that the project’s scale and environmental footprint are incompatible with the historic downtown Sausalito area. The filing urges city officials to deny the project’s ministerial approval based on these findings because full environmental impact report (EIR) is necessary.

"Protecting Our Natural Environment"

“This is not only about the important work of preserving and protecting our historic district; it’s about protecting our natural environment,” a spokesperson for Save Our Sausalito stated. “We cannot allow development that jeopardizes the biodiversity that makes Sausalito unique.”

Local Opposition Grows

The proposed development has faced mounting opposition from local residents and environmental groups. Save Our Sausalito has been at the forefront of these efforts, advocating for sustainable development practices that align with the city’s environmental and historical preservation goals.

City officials are expected to review the findings and make a decision on whether the project can proceed under the current streamlined approval process in spite of the environmental hazards that Dr. Smallwood detailed.

Your contributions make filings like this possible.

Related Articles

Save Our Sausalito's legal team argues the proposed 294-unit, 6-story Harbor Drive development cannot bypass environmental review. The project's height waivers, density bonus requests, and heritage tree removals all require discretionary city decisions triggering mandatory CEQA review...
Stand With has already helped secure two early wins, and we’re now making it a regular program where neighbors can support one another, advocate with the City when needed, and work together to protect the character, livability, and quality..
Today the Marin IJ reported on YIMBY's recent appeal of their lawsuit to invalidate Sausalito's Housing Element. This appeal could affect local zoning and projects like 83 Princess and 605 Bridgeway...